Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

Background: COVID-19 vaccination uptake is influenced by various sociodemographic and psychological factors. Previous studies have suggested that the relationship between personality traits and vaccination is context-dependent. However, this association has not been investigated in Japan, a unique sociocultural context characterized by historically low vaccine confidence but exceptionally high COVID-19 vaccine uptake. We examined the association between the Big Five personality traits and completion of the primary COVID-19 vaccination series, exploring potential gender-personality interactions. Methods: A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted among 7,210 Japanese adults (aged 20-85 years) in December 2021. Personality was assessed using the Japanese version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory. Multivariable Poisson generalized estimating equations were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) and assess gender-personality interactions. Results: Higher extraversion and lower openness were significantly associated with vaccination completion across genders. A significant gender-agreeableness interaction was observed: agreeableness (PR = 1.016, 95% CI: 1.008-1.024) was positively associated with vaccination completion among men but not women. A similar, though only marginally significant, interaction pattern was observed for neuroticism (PR = 1.011, 95% CI: 1.004-1.019 among men). Conclusions: Personality traits act as modest but meaningful, gender-specific psychological modifiers of vaccination behavior in Japan. Public health campaigns should transition from traditional "one-size-fits-all" messages to personality-tailored and gender-responsive communication strategies to optimize vaccine uptake and bolster psychological resilience in future pandemics.

Objectives To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on the prevention of long COVID (LC) in the Omicron era through an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods We performed an update of our previously published systematic review and meta-analysis of vaccination and LC risk (searches between 1 January 2022 and 1 March 2024). Databases (Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Europe PMC, LILACS, Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register) were searched for studies published between 1 March 2024 and 13 July 2026. Observational studies assessing the impact of vaccination on the risk of LC four or more weeks after SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Vaccines were restricted to those centrally authorised in the European Union. Random-effects meta-analyses, restricted to adults, were performed to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) of LC in three comparisons: vaccinated (any dose) versus unvaccinated; booster vaccination versus unvaccinated; and booster vaccination versus primary course vaccination only. Results Nineteen new studies were identified, of which ten were included in the updated meta-analyses alongside eight studies from the original review. The pooled OR of LC in vaccinated adults (any dose) versus unvaccinated was 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.84; 13 studies). ORs were also lower for booster vaccination versus unvaccinated (0.73; 95% CI 0.65-0.82; 6 studies), and booster vaccination versus primary course vaccination (0.63; 95% CI 0.53-0.75; 6 studies). Significant associations between vaccination and lower LC odds were observed in subgroup analyses of mRNA-only vaccination and LC outcomes three or more months after infection. Conclusions This updated review and meta-analysis reinforces our previous finding that vaccination may reduce the burden of LC in the Omicron era, with booster doses potentially providing additional protection. Although evidence in high-risk groups now prioritised for vaccination in most countries remains limited, these findings clearly demonstrate the benefits of vaccination and support current seasonal vaccination strategies.

BackgroundSince the COVID-19 pandemic, parental delays and refusals of well-established, safe, and effective childhood vaccinations have contributed to the resurgence of infectious diseases. This raises concerns that COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy may also extend to novel vaccines for children when introduced in the future. This study examined caregivers, who included healthcare workers (HCWs), perceptions of novel vaccinations for children ages 0-17 years old and intentions to vaccinate children and adolescents ages 12-17 years against COVID-19. MethodsWe conducted a secondary data analysis of a larger cross-sectional survey administered to parents/caregivers of children ages 0-17 years in Lusaka, Zambia, between 13 November and 15 December 2023. Vaccination intention for COVID-19 was specifically focused on caregivers of adolescents ages 12-17 years, following COVID-19 vaccination guidelines during the study. Descriptive statistics were used to explore demographic characteristics, vaccination history, and caregivers COVID-19 vaccination status, along with their childrens routine childhood vaccine histories and perceptions of COVID-19 and novel vaccinations. ResultsAmong 277 caregivers (66.8% women, median age: 35 years), 93.1% reported that their child had received all recommended routine childhood vaccinations. COVID-19 vaccine uptake was higher among HCWs (68.2% with [≥]2 doses) than among community members (40.8%) and having [≥]2 doses was associated with higher COVID-19 vaccine uptake among their adolescents ages 12-17 years. 58.0% of caregivers indicated that their 12-17 years old adolescents had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Overall intention to further vaccinate children against COVID-19, especially among those already unvaccinated, remained low, with 24.7% of caregivers reporting no intent to vaccinate their children. Protection from hospitalization and death from malaria, TB, HIV, pneumonia, influenza, and diarrheal diseases were the most cited reason (79.1%) for intention to vaccinate children with novel vaccines for these diseases. The most prominent reasons for reluctance towards future vaccines were the fear of potential side effects (45.5%) and insufficient knowledge about vaccination benefits and risks (31.8%). Caregivers most trusted the Ministry of Health (86.6%) and healthcare professionals (66.8%) as sources of vaccine information. ConclusionsWhile routine childhood vaccine uptake remained high, acceptance of COVID-19 and future novel vaccines for children was lower and was influenced by caregivers own vaccination status. Targeted and transparent communication through trusted sources such as the Ministry of Health and healthcare professionals may be critical for addressing safety concerns and strengthening confidence in novel childhood vaccines.

Introduction:Although the COVID-19 pandemic clearly showed the potential consequences of a world without vaccinations, vaccine hesitancy is likely to be more pronounced in the post-COVID-19 era. The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines in this context is likely to raise particular concerns. In Tunisia, decision-makers have prioritized the introduction of HPV vaccine into the immunization schedule. This study assessed individual barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccine acceptability in Tunisia, with the aim of guiding an effective communication strategy for HPV vaccination campaigns in Tunisia and neighboring countries in a post-pandemic context.Methods: Using a qualitative design, we conducted 14 focus groups (FG) with healthcare professionals (HCP) (N=32) and community representatives (CR) (N=89) in five regions of the country. The discussion followed a semi-structured guide designed on the basis of vaccine hesitancy determinants matrix. Transcripts were deductively analyzed according to the 'social processes' and 'thinking and feeling' of the behavioural and social drivers (BeSD) Framework. Inductive approach was used to analyze participants suggestions for promoting HPV vaccination.Results:The FG analysis demonstrated that the historically strong trust in vaccination in Tunisia has weakened after the COVID-19 pandemic. Mistrust of health system and experts, the pandemic management and vaccine mandates measures had negative influence on the vaccine attitudes in a post pandemic Tunisian context. Persistent concerns about COVID-19 vaccines safety were frequently intertwined with widespread distrust of pharmaceutical companies and their profit motives, perceived as imposing inequitable access and lower-quality vaccines on countries in the Global South. These concerns fueled confusion about vaccines side effects. The weakening of immunity was recurring, as well as memory issues, impacts on fertility, and sudden deaths. Regarding information, our research revealed that although digital platforms were perceived as widely used, a significant part of the population interviewed considered public TV channel, as the most reliable source of health information.Conclusions: Emphasizing how the pandemic has shaped individual and collective perceptions and attitudes toward vaccination, our findings underline the importance of leveraging lessons learned from the pandemic to develop a context tailored and coherent communication strategy for successful HPV vaccine implementation.

There is currently no clinical data for the effectiveness of the only licensed Ebola virus disease vaccine (Ervebo) against Bundibugyo virus disease. A number of studies have shown immune cross-reactivity with Bundibugyo virus after Ervebo vaccination. However, antibody recognition of Bundibugyo is around 2.8-fold lower than recognition of Ebola virus. Here, we aimed to infer how a 2.8-fold drop in immune recognition may affect Ervebo protection against Bundibugyo virus disease based on analysis of data on Ervebo immunogenicity and protection from Ebola virus disease. This work has three main components. Firstly, we analysed the timing of vaccine protection in the Ervebo pivotal ring vaccination clinical trial. Secondly, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of antibody responses to Ebola virus after Ervebo vaccination over time. Thirdly, we combined these data with previously reported data on the cross-reactivity to Bundibugyo virus to infer protection of Ervebo against Bundibugyo virus disease. We find that the clinical trial data for Ervebo supports vaccine protection beginning earlier than 10 days after vaccination. Secondly, binding antibody levels against Ebola virus on day 28 post vaccination (peak responses) were on average 12.9-fold (95% confidence interval, CI: 6.4 - 26.0) higher than on day 7, 6.3-fold (95% CI: 3.7 -10.8) higher than on day 10, and 2.5-fold (95% CI: 1.4 - 4.4) higher than on day 14 (neutralising antibodies showed similar results). Finally, we consider the scenarios where antibody levels to Ebola virus at day 7 or 10 are putative protective thresholds against Ebola virus disease, and we assume these thresholds also apply for Bundibugyo virus disease. Then, with a 2.8-fold reduction of responses to Bundibugyo compared to Ebola virus, we predict antibody responses to Bundibugyo virus after Ervebo vaccination are likely above these putative protective thresholds.

Importance Several influenza vaccine products are available for older adults, but evidence combining both their absolute effectiveness and head-to-head comparisons within the same large population remains scarce, limiting product-specific vaccination guidance for this high-risk group. Objective To estimate the relative and absolute effectiveness of influenza vaccines against influenza-related hospitalization and in-hospital mortality among older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants Nationwide cohort study using the French National Health Data System (SNDS), including all adults born in 1958 or earlier, living in metropolitan France, at the start of the 2023-2024 campaign. Relative effectiveness (rVE) was assessed using a landmark design with exposure fixed before epidemic onset. Absolute effectiveness (VE) was assessed using a sequential trial emulation with weekly matching of newly vaccinated individuals to yet unvaccinated controls. Follow-up ran from December 5, 2023 to April 19, 2024. Exposures Vaccination with a high-dose (Efluelda) or one of three standard-dose quadrivalent vaccines (Influvac, Fluarix, Vaxigrip), compared individually or by dosage category, and against no vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures Hospitalization with a diagnosis of influenza and death during such hospitalization. Effectiveness was estimated as 1 minus the hazard ratio from weighted Cox models, with corresponding numbers needed to vaccinate to prevent one case. Results Among 13.8 million eligible individuals, 5.7 million (41%) were vaccinated at the beginning of follow-up. The high-dose vaccine showed greater rVE than standard-dose vaccines against hospitalization (27% [95%CI, 23 to 31%]) and in-hospital death (27% [95%CI,14 to 38%]). Absolute VE was 39% (95%CI, 38 to 41%) against hospitalization and 45% (95%CI, 40 to 49%) against in-hospital death, and was higher for the high-dose vaccine (50%) than standard-dose vaccines (36%) against hospitalization. This difference was most evident among adults 70 years and older, while overall effectiveness declined with age. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, influenza vaccination conferred moderate protection against severe outcomes in older adults, and high-dose vaccination was associated with significantly greater effectiveness than standard-dose vaccines, particularly among adults 70 years and older. These findings support product-level differentiation in vaccination strategy for this population.

Introduction: This study compared the health and economic impact of the 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (aPCV21) vs the 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) on invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) and post-meningitis sequelae (PMS) among adults aged 65 years and older in the United Kingdom (UK). Methods: A published Markov model was used to simulate a single-cohort of vaccine-naive adults who became eligible for age-based vaccination at age 65 years, with uptake occurring over time. The cohort was followed until a maximum age of 100 years. Model inputs were derived from publicly available national health data and published reports. Outcomes were discounted at 3.5% annually, and costs were adjusted to the 2024 Great Britain Pound ({pound}). Additional analyses explored the impact of changing the age-based recommendation from 65 years to 75 years. Scenarios involving instantaneous vaccine uptake rates were included as part of the sensitivity analyses. A deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed on the incremental direct medical costs between vaccinating with aPCV21 vs PCV20 under the age-based recommendation of 65 years. Results: Using an age-based recommendation of 65 years, aPCV21 led to fewer cases, deaths, and costs than PCV20. Compared with PCV20, aPCV21 averted an additional 138 IPD cases, 1 PMS case, and 22 IPD deaths, saving {pound}1.2 million in direct medical costs. Raising the age-based recommendation from 65 to 75 years and using aPCV21 (or PCV20, respectively), resulted in 120 (92) additional IPD cases, 2 (1) additional PMS case(s), 19 (14) additional IPD death(s), and an extra {pound}1.1 ({pound}0.8) million in direct medical costs. The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that aPCV21 reduced direct medical costs across all parameter ranges. Conclusions: Compared with PCV20, aPCV21 prevented more IPD cases, IPD deaths, and direct medical costs among older adults in the UK. Changing the age-based recommendation from age 65 to 75 resulted in worse health and economic outcomes. Key words. Pneumococcal infections; pneumococcal vaccines; vaccines, conjugate; serotype; United Kingdom; health costs

Background Women living with HIV (WLHIV) have an increased risk of persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cervical cancer. We evaluated the lifetime health impact and cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination strategies targeting WLHIV across 13 African countries. Methods We developed an age-structured Markov model of HPV infection and cervical cancer in a closed cohort of 100,000 females, stratified by HIV status, and calibrated it separately for each country to age-specific cervical cancer incidence, cervical cancer mortality, and female HIV prevalence. Six HIV-targeted strategies were compared with routine two-dose vaccination at age 14 years. The strategies either provided a booster dose to previously vaccinated WLHIV or combined a booster for previously vaccinated WLHIV with a three-dose primary catch-up course for previously unvaccinated WLHIV. Interventions were delivered at ages 18 or 24 years under standard- and high-coverage assumptions. Outcomes included cervical cancer cases averted, cervical cancer deaths averted among WLHIV, discounted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted, additional physical vaccine doses, and incremental costs from the health-system and vaccination-programme perspectives. Results All six strategies generated additional health gains relative to routine vaccination alone. Mean DALYs averted across countries ranged from 8.21 for booster vaccination at age 24 years to 81.36 for high-coverage combined booster and catch-up vaccination at age 24 years. Booster-only strategies produced the greatest health gains per additional physical vaccine dose, whereas the high-coverage combined strategy at age 24 years produced the largest average absolute health gain. However, the relative performance of vaccination at ages 18 and 24 years varied by strategy and country. From the health-system perspective, 68 of 78 country-strategy comparisons were more effective and less costly than routine vaccination after accounting for avoided cervical cancer treatment costs. From the vaccination-programme perspective, all strategies required additional expenditure. Conclusions HPV vaccination strategies targeting WLHIV generated additional health benefits beyond routine adolescent vaccination and were cost-saving in many country-strategy comparisons when avoided cervical cancer treatment costs were included. Booster-only strategies were the most dose-efficient, whereas combined booster and primary catch-up strategies produced larger absolute health gains. The relative performance of strategies delivered at ages 18 and 24 years was context dependent and should not be interpreted as evidence of a universal advantage of later vaccination. Given the limited direct evidence on the clinical effectiveness and duration of protection following HPV booster vaccination among WLHIV, the booster scenarios should be interpreted as exploratory.

BackgroundSub-Saharan Africa (sSA) faces accelerated growth in Alzheimers disease and related dementias (ADRDs), including in older people living with HIV (PLWH). However, there are limited contextually relevant diagnostic tools to assess cognitive impairment in the region. The Tablet-based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT) is a digital platform hosting cognitive tests with automated scoring that can be administered by non-specialists and are designed for use across diverse cultures, languages, and education levels. We translated, adapted, and assessed the validity of a brief battery of TabCAT tests in the Uganda Aging and Dementia Cohort Study (UADCS), a prospective cohort of older PLWH and age- and sex-similar adults not living with HIV in southwestern Uganda. MethodsFour TabCAT tests were translated and culturally adapted through expert review and focus groups of adults at study sites. Psychometric validity was examined by assessing floor and ceiling effects, association with known demographic predictors, and concurrent and divergent validity against a reference-standard cognitive testing battery previously validated and employed in Uganda. Z-scores on all tests were derived using a regression-based normative approach to adjust for age, sex, education, urbanicity, and literacy. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were fit to assess the TabCAT Composite Score performance in discriminating objective cognitive impairment (defined using Jak/Bondi criteria) in the total sample, then stratified by HIV serostatus. ResultsTabCAT tests were reported by local experts and focus groups to have acceptable face and content validity. Participants (n=563, mean age 60{+/-}6.4, 50% female, 51% did not complete primary school, 16% were not literate, 49% PLWH) completed the reference-standard and TabCAT battery. For TabCAT tests, there were no notable floor or ceiling effects, and test scores were associated with age and education as expected. Correlations between TabCAT and reference-standard tests were stronger in aligning cognitive domains (memory, executive function) than in non-aligning domains (motor). The TabCAT Composite Score discriminated cognitive impairment with good performance (c-statistic 0.77; 95% CI 0.72-0.81), including among PLWH. DiscussionTabCAT tests demonstrated face, content, construct, concurrent, and criterion validity for measuring cognition and detecting objective cognitive impairment among older adults in Uganda, including PLWH. These results support the potential of tablet-based brief cognitive assessment tools to measure cognitive performance and detect cognitive impairment in Uganda, including among older PLWH, and in populations with lower levels of education and literacy.

Objectives: To evaluate the epidemiological evolution of unique pneumococcal serotypes covered by either PCV20 or PCV21, common serotypes by both vaccines and non-vaccine serotypes in adults. Methods: We characterized all national IPD clinical isolates from January 2009 to June 2026. Results: The highest burden of IPD was caused by serotypes shared between PCV20 and PCV21 with serotypes 3 and 8 the most prevalent in adults of all ages. During the pre-pandemic period, IPD caused by unique-PCV20 serotypes declined probably due to herd protection by paediatric vaccination with PCVs. In contrast, unique-PCV21 serotypes increased in incidence accounting for more cases than unique-PCV20 serotypes. However, after the COVID-19 pandemic, a different pattern was observed with unique-PCV20 serotypes increasing in incidence due a marked rise in IPD caused by serotypes 4 and 14 that has progressively reduced the gap in disease coverage. In adults aged 18-64 years, the fraction of disease that could be prevented with PCV20/PCV21 changed from 5% in favour of PCV21 (years 2022/2023) to 15% in favour of PCV20 (year 2026) whereas in adults [≥]65 years the vaccine contribution declined from 20% in favour of PCV21 (year 2022) to 8% in 2026. Conclusions: IPD trends in adults have changed after the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in recent years. Our study emphasizes the rapid re-emergence of infections caused by traditional PCV7 serotypes especially serotypes 4 and 14 and reinforce the idea that the use of broader PCVs must be accompanied by an increase in the uptake rates in adults of all ages.

Background: Filoviruses, specifically Ebola virus (EBOV), Bundibugyo virus (BDBV), and Marburg virus (MARV), have been the etiologic agents of multiple outbreaks of severe disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). Two EBOV-specific vaccine regimens have been approved for use in outbreak scenarios, including the Ad26.ZEBOV/MVA-BN-Filo (Zabdeno/Mvabea) two-dose vaccine, where the MVA-BN-Filo booster dose contains EBOV, MARV, and Sudan (SUDV) virus glycoproteins (GPs) and the nucleoprotein from Tai Forest virus. While long-term immunogenicity of up to two years has been found in clinical trial settings, limited real-world data exists. Methods: Using a multiplexed immunoassay, samples (n=698 at baseline) collected in Mbandaka, Equateur province, DRC, between September 2023 and October 2024 were assessed for seroreactivity to six filovirus antigens (1 BDBV, 2 EBOV, 2 MARV, and 1 SUDV) at three distinct periods: baseline/pre-vaccination, 6-8 weeks post-first dose (Zabdeno), at booster administration (Mvabea), and one-year post-boost dose. Results: Substantial filovirus seroreactivity was found at baseline, with 48.7% (n=340/698) of individuals being seroreactive to at least one virus antigen. High baseline seroreactivity was found against BDBV GP (31.1%, n=217/698), with lower baseline seroreactivity to EBOV GP (15.5%, n=106/698), comparatively. Overall EBOV GP seroreactivity increased to 66.8% (n=376/563) at one year-post vaccine boost and 57.6% (n=250/434) of participants were seroreactive. Despite the booster dose inclusion of SUDV GP and MARV GP, there were no substantial increases in reactivity against either antigen at subsequent timepoints. Overall filovirus seroreactivity increased at all timepoints for the entire cohort, although filovirus reactivity decreased over the study period for those who were seroreactive at baseline. Findings: These data highlight detection of significantly elevated seoreactivity to EBOV GP following first-dose administration of Ad26.ZEBOV, which remained relatively stable one-year post-booster dose administration. Additionally, this study identifies high levels of baseline seroreactivity to BDBV GP despite no previous documented outbreaks in this region of DRC. These data suggest that vaccination with the Ad26.ZEBOV-MVA-BN-Filo vaccine induces stable seroreactivity against EBOV GP, but not to other filovirus antigens.

We report general acceptance (79.0%) of Ebola vaccination in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) between 2023-2024 (n=5,062). Acceptance varied significantly by province with acceptance ranging from 47.6% in Kongo Central to 92.1% in Tshuapa province and was highest among healthcare workers. While Ebola vaccine acceptance and disease knowledge are relatively strong nationally in the DRC, regional differences do exist and may impact future vaccine rollout.

Background Influenza vaccines have seen many changes over recent years in terms of both policy recommendations and product types. Immune responses and vaccine effectiveness vary by vaccine strain composition and product type. This study aimed to explore this variation on a regional level through examining spatial and temporal autocorrelations of vaccine uptake of different product types within Michigan from 2017 to 2021. Methods Influenza vaccine administration data from the 2017/18 to 2021/22 seasons were obtained from the Michigan Care Improvement Registry. Population size estimates for 2017 and 2019 were obtained from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. Age-standardized and age-stratified vaccination rates were computed. Disparate county-level vaccine uptake clusters were constructed using spatial autocorrelation indicators and spatiotemporal clusters were identified using scan statistics. Linear mixed effect models were used to study the impact of social vulnerability and urbanicity level on seasonal influenza vaccination rate. Results Vaccination incidence rates for adjuvanted, recombinant, and nasal sprays vaccines and for any vaccines increased significantly through the study period. County-level spatiotemporal clusters of type-specific uptake rates were identified. Most notably, we identified an emerging cluster with high uptake of adjuvanted vaccine radiating from Ottawa County, located in suburban Grand Rapids, and the disappearance of high uptake cluster for high-dose vaccine uptake in the area. Vaccination rates by any product type were found to vary seasonally and showed weak negative association with more rural regions. The overall vaccination rates appear to be lower among counties with higher social vulnerability in certain urbanicity levels, but social vulnerability and urbanicity were not significantly associated with overall vaccination rate during the study period. Conclusions Vaccine type-specific uptake was spatially and temporally diverse in Michigan between 2017 and 2022. Mid and Northern Michigan had consistently relatively lower vaccination rate compared to other regions in Michigan.

Background: Recombinant (RIV) and cell culture-based inactivated (ccIIV) influenza vaccines could improve seasonal influenza prevention; however, evidence is limited in how protection may differ among non-egg-based vaccines. Methods: We conducted a randomized trial of RIV versus ccIIV to compare vaccine immunogenicity in adults aged 18 to 64 years during the 2024-25 influenza season (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06518577). Active surveillance for influenza-like illness was conducted for six months post-vaccination and cumulative incidence of influenza by vaccine type was compared to estimate relative vaccine efficacy. Participants were tested for influenza by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction or rapid antigen tests. Immunogenicity was evaluated by hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), virus microneutralization (MN), and neuraminidase inhibition (NAI) assays in a subset of blood specimens collected pre-vaccination and one-month post-vaccination. Results: Among the 591 participants, 25 cases of influenza A were detected; 2.4% cumulative incidence among RIV recipients versus 6.1% among ccIIV recipients. The probability of influenza was 61% lower with RIV than ccIIV (95% confidence interval: 7 to 84). Among 151 participants, post-vaccination HAI and MN titers vaccine components were higher among RIV recipients while NAI titers were higher among ccIIV recipients. Conclusions: RIV provided better protection than ccIIV against influenza A illness in adults during the U.S. 2024-2025 season.

Background: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) and midazolam (MDZ) are commonly used agents for conscious sedation in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). While DEX offers superior sedation quality and potential neuroprotective effects, it is also associated with risk of hemodynamic instability. High-quality evidence directly comparing their impact on functional outcomes after EVT is lacking. This trial aims to determine whether conscious sedation with DEX, compared to MDZ, improves functional outcomes in patients with AIS due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) undergoing EVT. Methods: PEACE (Dexmedetomidine versus Midazolam for Conscious Sedation during Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy) is a prospective, randomized, open label, blinded-endpoint, multicenter trial. Up to 810 patients with AIS due to LVO in the anterior circulation within 24 hours of last known well will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either DEX or MDZ for conscious sedation during EVT across 30 centers in China. Results: The primary end point is the proportion of patients achieving a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2 at 90 days, analyzed in the intention-to-treat population using a modified Poisson regression model, with results expressed as a risk ratio. Key secondary outcomes include the ordinal distribution of mRS scores at 90 days, and successful recanalization. Safety outcomes include symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 48 hours, and mortality at 90 days. Conclusion: The PEACE trial will provide definitive, high-level evidence on the comparative efficacy and safety of DEX versus MDZ for conscious sedation during EVT in patients with AIS due to LVO in the anterior circulation, with the goal of guiding clinical practice.

Importance: With a recent shift towards summer seasonal predominance of COVID-19 across much of the US, debate continues over optimal COVID-19 vaccination strategies regarding timing (including summer vaccination), eligibility, and dosing frequency. We evaluated the population-level impact of alternative vaccine strategies to inform US and state vaccine policy. Objective: To compare reductions in COVID-19 hospitalizations under different vaccination timing, eligibility, and dosing frequency. Design: Decision analytical model using a stochastic individual-based model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, calibrated to US COVID-19 hospitalization incidence from May 2024-April 2025. Setting: Simulated US national population, with additional scenarios representing state-level seasonal patterns. Participants: Simulated population of 5 million individuals with US age structure, stratified by risk group (immunocompetent, high risk with comorbid conditions, or immunocompromised). Exposures: Vaccination timing, universal or age- and risk-based eligibility, and dosing frequency, including a hybrid strategy of universal annual vaccination with a second dose for adults [≥]65 years and immunocompromised adults (US vaccine policy during the study period). Main Outcomes and Measures: COVID-19 hospitalization risk per 100,000 persons by age-risk group, measured among vaccinated individuals and in the total population. Results: If summer COVID-19 vaccination timing is feasible, annual universal vaccination in July minimized risk (441 [95% UI: 423-463] COVID-19 hospitalizations per 100,000 persons among adults [≥]65 years) compared to a counterfactual scenario with no additional vaccination given during the study period (578 [553-601]). If timing does not change, hybrid vaccination minimized risk, followed by semiannual risk-based vaccination (460 [440-487] and 477 [454-499] hospitalizations per 100,000 in adults [≥]65 years, respectively). The advantage of summer timing diminished if vaccine coverage decreased by 5-10 absolute percentage points (25-50% relative decrease). The magnitude of benefit from summer-timed vaccination and semiannual doses in the highest-risk groups varied regionally. Conclusions and Relevance: Although annual COVID-19 vaccination has historically been timed for winter transmission, summer vaccination may avert more hospitalizations if coverage is maintained, especially in states with predominantly summer transmission including Western and Southern states. The comparative impact of vaccination strategies, especially the benefit of a semiannual dose in the highest-risk groups, may vary regionally. COVID-19 vaccination timing and eligibility may warrant reconsideration.

Background Killed whole-cell oral cholera vaccines require multiple doses and have reduced efficacy in young children, limiting their utility. PanChol is a single-dose, oral live-attenuated cholera vaccine engineered from a current seventh pandemic El Tor O1 Vibrio cholerae strain. PanChol was shown to be safe and immunogenic in a previous phase 1a trial. In participants from this first-in-human trial, we aimed to assess the durability of the initial PanChol dose and the safety and immunogenicity of a second dose. Methods This open-label phase 1a booster study was conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA). Eligible participants were healthy adults aged 18-55 years without a history of cholera or gastrointestinal disorders and had received a PanChol dose ranging from 105-1010 colony-forming units (CFU) within the previous 322-1111 days. All participants received a booster dose of 2x107 CFU. The primary outcome was safety, including solicited, unsolicited, and serious adverse events following the second dose of PanChol. Secondary endpoints were the magnitude of pre- and post-vaccination serum vibriocidal titers to both Inaba and Ogawa V. cholerae, including seroconversion (4-fold rise in titers over baseline), and stool shedding of PanChol organisms using quantitative and qualitative stool cultures. Comparisons of the amount of vaccine shedding in stool following primary and secondary immunization were used to assess the intestinal mucosal immunity elicited by the initial PanChol dose. All outcomes were assessed in all participants. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05657782, and is complete. Findings Between Aug 25, 2025, and Feb 20, 2026, 20 healthy adults who previously received a single oral dose of PanChol were enrolled to receive a booster dose of 2x107 CFU. Eleven (55%) of 20 participants were male and the median age was 43{middle dot}6 (IQR 30{middle dot}2-49{middle dot}5). Ten (50%) were White and 17 (85%) were not Hispanic or Latino. Nine (45%) of 20 boost recipients reported at least one solicited adverse event; 13 (93%) of 14 events were mild, and all were transient. The most common solicited adverse event was nausea, reported by 4 (20%) participants; all cases were mild. Most unsolicited adverse events were mild; one was grade 3 and was deemed unrelated to vaccination. Two unsolicited adverse events were deemed related to vaccination (mild gassy sensation and heartburn, both of which occurred on day 1 and resolved the same day). In most participants, vibriocidal antibody titers measured on the day of boosting exceeded baseline titers prior to the initial dose (17 (85%) for Inaba and 14 (70%) for Ogawa). Fifteen (75%) of 20 boost recipients seroconverted vibriocidal antibody titers to both serotypes. After the boost, 17 (85%) participants had no or self-limited vaccine shedding, compared with 10% after the first PanChol dose. Interpretation A second oral dose of PanChol had a favorable safety profile and induced vibriocidal seroconversion to both serotypes in 75% of boost recipients. Intestinal colonization of PanChol following the boost serves as a proxy for measuring mucosal immunity targeting V. cholerae. The decrease in in the abundance of PanChol fecal shedding following the second dose, compared with the first, suggests that a single dose of PanChol is sufficient to confer durable protective immunity against a cholera challenge. These observations underscore the need for further clinical development of PanChol. Funding Wellcome Trust.

Background/Aims: In medical practice, the rising prevalence of infections in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) is a notable concern. However, understanding the incidence and risk factors associated with infections in KTRs remains limited. This study aims to assess the incidence and factors associated infection among KTRs. Additionally, we also investigate the median time of each infection among KTRs. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 1 January 2018- 31 December 2022 at Thailand's tertiary hospital. We performed univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses to identify potential risk factors related infection and investigated for the incidence and median time of each infection among KTRs. Results: A total of 179 participants were included in this study. Our findings reveal the kidney from living donor was protective factor for infection among KTRs (aOR 0.063, 95% CI 0.005-0.792; p = 0.032). Urinary tract infections (UTIs)showed as the predominant pathogenic manifestation among KTRs (43%). The median time of UTIs, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) were 16, 57 and 94.5 days, respectively. Conclusions: Our study establishes that receiving a kidney from a living donor is a protective factor against post-kidney transplant infections. Particularly urinary tract infections were most common of infection. Monitoring urinary tract infections post-transplantation is recommended. Moreover, awareness of UTI, CMV infection and PCP should be concerned during 2-3 months after transplantation. However, due to a small sample size; we recommend to increase the number of particular participants in further investigations.

SARS-CoV-2 antigenic evolution continues to challenge strain-matched vaccination. For the 2026-27 season, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) identified XFG as the preferred antigen within the JN.1 family and Comirnaty XFG was authorised in the European Union in July, 2026. We studied 22 participants who received 30 microg of mRNA encoding XFG (Comirnaty XFG, BioNTech/Pfizer, Mainz, Germany) in September, 2026 and had paired serum available before vaccination and median 14 days afterwards. Median Wuhan-Hu-1 S1-specific IgG increased from 1600 BAU/mL (IQR 1118-2926) to 2914 BAU/mL (2117-4468), a 1.8-fold increase. Median RBD-binding ED50 increased from 116 (51.4-212) to 305.6 (170.8-434.6) for LP.8.1 and from 354.3 (129.2-558.2) to 832.9 (429-1175) for NB.1.8.1, corresponding to 2.6-fold and 2.4-fold increases, respectively (all p<0.0001). XFG-adapted vaccination increased neutralising activity against each tested variant. The GMT against XFG increased from 180 before vaccination to 894 afterwards (5.0-fold), and that against RV.1.3 increased from 121 to 599 (4.9-fold). GMTs increased from 117 to 386 for PQ.16.1.1 (3.3-fold), from 101 to 316 for XFG.1.1 (3.1-fold), from 629 to 1772 for LP.8.1 (2.8-fold), from 221 to 611 for NB.1.8.1 (2.8-fold), and from 228 to 642 for PJ.2.1 (2.8-fold). Neutralisation of BA.3.2.2 increased more modestly, from GMT 78 to 126 (1.6-fold; p=0.0009). Pre- versus post-vaccination neutralisation titres differed significantly for all variants (p<0.001). Despite the broad increase, post-vaccination neutralisation remained heterogeneous. Relative to LP.8.1, GMTs were 2.0-fold lower for XFG, 2.8-fold lower for PJ.2.1, 2.9-fold lower for NB.1.8.1, 3.0-fold lower for RV.1.3, 4.6-fold lower for PQ.16.1.1, 5.6-fold lower for XFG.1.1, and 14.1-fold lower for BA.3.2.2. These findings provide early human immunogenicity data after XFG-adapted mRNA vaccination. The largest relative increases were observed for XFG and RV.1.3, whereas LP.8.1 remained the most strongly neutralised variant after Comirnaty XFG vaccination and BA.3.2.2 the least. This pattern suggests broad boosting of cross-reactive humoral immunity without elimination of between-variant differences. The small, extensively pre-immunised cohort, short follow-up, absence of a contemporaneous vaccine-comparator group, and use of a pseudovirus assay limit inference. Our data characterise early antibody binding and neutralisation but do not establish durability or clinical effectiveness.

Introduction: Vaping public education campaigns are a central prevention strategy for young adults (YAs), but message effectiveness varies widely and formative testing typically evaluates one message attribute at a time. This study examined how four perceptual dimensions, including cognitive engagement, social relevance, emotional arousal, and emotional valence, relate to perceived message effectiveness (PME), and whether multiple combinations of these dimensions correspond to similarly high PME. Methods: In a cross-sectional online message-testing study conducted from March to April 2025, 540 U.S. YAs who vape each evaluated 15 messages randomly sampled from a corpus of 229 text-image vaping public education messages, yielding 8,100 message evaluations. Cross-classified multilevel models estimated associations between each perceptual dimension and PME. An Explainable Boosting Machine probed nonlinear associations, and k-means clustering of high-predicted-PME perceptual configurations identified distinct profiles. Analyses were conducted in 2026. Results: Cognitive engagement (b = 0.20, 95% CI [0.18, 0.22]) and social relevance (b = 0.15, 95% CI [0.13, 0.17]) showed the strongest associations with PME, followed by emotional arousal (b = 0.06, 95% CI [0.04, 0.08]); emotional valence showed no linear association (b = 0.00, 95% CI [-0.02, 0.02]). The Explainable Boosting Machine revealed a U-shaped valence pattern, with higher predicted PME at both the negative and positive ends of the scale. Clustering yielded five distinct perceptual profiles with similarly high predicted PME (4.10-4.25). Conclusions: Multiple perceptual configurations correspond to similarly high PME, supporting a configurational approach to formative message testing rather than a single optimal message formula.